In Jenkins Vs TeamCity section you will learn what are the basic differences between TeamCity and Jenkins and which one is better for you.
Both TeamCity and Jenkins products are capable of large scale operations even at high levels. TeamCity and Jenkins are CI tools that allow developers to integrate code branches during the development process and run a series of automated tests against them.
In short you should choose the tool very carefully because both the tools are good in their respective places.
Table of Contents
Jenkins Vs TeamCity
|1.||It was licensed under MIT license.||It was licensed under a proprietary commercial license.|
|2.||It is open-source and free.||It is commercial and paid and has only a few features for free of cost and it is a proprietary offering from JetBrains.|
|3.||It supports advanced features as compared to TeamCity.||It does not have advanced features as compare to Jenkins.|
|4.||Jenkins API comes in three flavors: XML, JSN, and Python. In Jenkins almost every part can be customized as needed and their extensibility page has excellent resources for almost every type of customization possible.||TeamCity has less information available on their site so there may be some difficulties during R&D. However, TeamCity users are happy with the API overall.|
|5.||Jenkins has big names on its list of users. For example,- Dell, Tumblr, and Netflix among them.||TeamCity also has a wide range of top companies as customers. For example, Internet powerhouses Twitter, eBay and Wikipedia.|
|6.||Jenkins is not easier to set up and configure.||As compare to Jenkins, TeamCity is easier to set up and configure.|
Difference between Jenkins and Apache Maven
Jenkins Vs Apache Maven, Maven and Jenkins are two separate tools that serve different purposes in the development lifecycle. In some domains, they overlap, however this is a rare case in which one must be selected over the other.
|1||Jenkins was created with the goal of implementing Continuous Integration (CI). It automatically evaluates the code in a repository, compiles and packages it, and delivers it to the server for testing. Jenkins has the ability to use Maven as a build tool.||Maven is a build tool for managing software dependencies and lifecycles. It also works with plugins that allow users to add actions such as build, test, package, and install.|
|2||The developers will have a simpler time creating and adding modular build phases.||But developers may find it challenging to create Maven and add modular build steps.|
|3||Jenkins builds may be extensively parameterized, and Jenkins builds can be easily modified in several phases – compilation, testing, and packaging.||But maven builds are less parameterized than Jenkins builds, and it’s more difficult to modularize builds into various stages – compile, test, and package.|
|4||Jenkins integrates with technologies such as Slack, Datadog, BrowserStack, and others.||Buddy, Flyway, JitPack, SonarQube, and more tools are integrated with Maven.|
|5||Jenkins was first introduced in 2011.||Maven was first released in early 2004.|
Difference between Jenkins and Octopus
Jenkins Vs Octopus, Jenkins is within the “continuous integration” technological stack, whereas Octopus deployment falls under the “Deployment as a Service” category.
|1||Jenkins is under the category of DevOps Platforms.||Configuration Management and Application Release Orchestration are two categories in which Octopus Deploy fits.|
|2||It’s free and open-source.||Cloud : Free first 10 deployment targets|
Server : Free first 10 deployment targets
|3||Jenkins has a lot of plug-ins, thus it’s good at communicating to other programmes.||Octopus is also good at recognizing other computers, determining their trustworthiness, determining what function those machines play, and determining whether or not a particular version of code has been effectively released.|
|4||Jenkins is adaptable; for example, you can use a config file to tell it what to do. The configuration file might have items like “execute this arbitrary command line stuff,” such as a batch file.||Good in configuring Octopus, for example, database connection strings should differ by machine.|
Although it is a matter of debate that which tools are better, according to the above differences you can decide which tool is fulfilling your requirement and which tool is suitable for you in continuous integration and deployment process.